Every science, as history that physics or theology, always refers to an object more or less determined, with which man has been found already. The scientist may refer determinately to him, and brought before him one or more problems whose attempt at a solution is the reality of science. This attempt is what constitutes a science, its direction is carried by some way and catches it.
Another, very different, is the subject of philosophy, it really begins to ignore if you have proper object, at least, not part formalmente de la previa posesión de él. La filosofía se presenta, ante todo, como un esfuerzo, como una "pretensión". Y esto es no por una simple ignorancia de hecho, sino por la esencia latente de aquel objeto. De aquí resulta que aquel riguroso axioma entre un problema fundamentado y su solución pierde su sentido primario tratándose de filosofía. Por esto, la filosofía tiene que ser una proyección de su objeto, una enérgica iluminación de él y un constante y constitutivo "darse cuenta". Mientras la ciencia habla sobre un objeto que ya se tiene con claridad, la filosofía es el esfuerzo por la progresiva constitución de su propio objeto; por esto, la filosofía sólo puede existir claimed, and is one of its formal dimensions, a "break through."
philosopher may have started with a subjective intellectual purpose. But this does not mean that this beginning is formally the principle of his philosophy. And if it is agreed that the principle of its principles is the nature of your problem, will say that the beginning is the end, and vice versa, in its original principle is revolutionary and all philosophy. Throughout this process, philosophy evolves, it is enriched with new features, but these features are demonstrated, they appear as moments of self. While immature science is imperfect, philosophy is the same process the experience. The rest is pseudo school and academic philosophy. Hence, unlike what happens in science, philosophy has to mature in each philosopher and, therefore, what actually constitutes its history is the story of the very idea of \u200b\u200bphilosophy.
philosopher may have started with a subjective intellectual purpose. But this does not mean that this beginning is formally the principle of his philosophy. And if it is agreed that the principle of its principles is the nature of your problem, will say that the beginning is the end, and vice versa, in its original principle is revolutionary and all philosophy. Throughout this process, philosophy evolves, it is enriched with new features, but these features are demonstrated, they appear as moments of self. While immature science is imperfect, philosophy is the same process the experience. The rest is pseudo school and academic philosophy. Hence, unlike what happens in science, philosophy has to mature in each philosopher and, therefore, what actually constitutes its history is the story of the very idea of \u200b\u200bphilosophy.
Our way of knowing is experience, and experience the art of noticing. We know the philosopher and know his philosophy, but it is the philosopher who creates it, but on the contrary, philosophy creates the philosopher.
0 comments:
Post a Comment